The Balakot Airstrikes: A Line Crossed

In the early hours of February 26, 2019, Indian Mirage-2000 fighter jets crossed the Line of Control and struck a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) training camp in Balakot, deep within Pakistan. The message was loud and clear: there would be no sanctuary for terrorists, regardless of geography.

This was a shift in doctrine. For years, India’s response to Pakistan-sponsored terror was reactive and restrained. But Pulwama marked a tipping point. The suicide bombing was carried out by JeM, a group with a long and bloody history of attacks on Indian soil, operating openly in Pakistan under the military’s watch. India could not afford silence anymore.

Historical Context: A Pattern of Provocations

Pakistan’s strategy of using non-state actors as instruments of asymmetric warfare dates back to the late 1980s. Since then, major terror attacks on India—ranging from the 1993 Mumbai blasts to the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, Pathankot in 2016, Uri in 2016, and Pulwama in 2019—have had one common thread: complicity or direct support from elements within Pakistan’s security establishment.

The 2008 Mumbai attacks were a grim example. David Headley, one of the key conspirators, confessed to receiving training and logistical support from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The U.S. National Security Archive has declassified numerous documents confirming ISI’s link to Lashkar-e-Taiba, the group that carried out the attacks.

Former U.S. Secretary of Defence Chuck Hagel once noted, “Pakistan has, in many cases, not been a full and willing partner in dealing with terrorism. They have, at times, helped fund and support it.” His words echoed what India had said for years, but what the world hesitated to acknowledge.

Rebutting Pakistan’s Narrative

Predictably, after the Balakot airstrikes, Pakistan dismissed the Indian action as “fictitious” and “a failed operation.” They claimed no damage was done. But satellite imagery, ground reports from independent journalists, and intercepted communication tell a different story. According to multiple credible sources, the target was a major Jem facility, and casualties were significant.

Pakistan’s strategy has always hinged on plausible deniability. They shelter terror groups in remote areas, rename them when global pressure mounts, and suppress any internal dissent or leaks. But the world is seeing through the charade.

Christine Fair, a South Asia expert and professor at Georgetown University, writes in her book Fighting to the End that “Pakistan’s army does not see these terrorist groups as liabilities; rather, they are assets that help advance strategic depth against India.” This explains the repeat offences and the state’s lack of genuine action.

The Case for the Indian Strike

India’s strike wasn’t about vengeance. It was about restoring deterrence. After Uri, India conducted surgical strikes on terror launch pads. Balakot took that a step further—hitting the infrastructure inside Pakistan proper. The message wasn’t just to terrorists. It was to their patrons in Rawalpindi: there will be a cost for continued proxy warfare.

Former Indian Army chief Gen. Bipin Rawat had famously said, “You have to fight the war with the weapons you have and in the manner that suits your strategy.” India’s strategy now includes pre-emptive, precise, and politically resolute military action.

International Reaction: Tides Turning

While some global powers called for restraint, few questioned the legitimacy of India’s position. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) put Pakistan on its “grey list” for failing to curb terror financing. The United Nations Security Council issued a statement condemning the Pulwama attack and naming JeM. Even nations traditionally neutral on South Asian conflicts acknowledged India’s right to self-defence.

A Necessary Stand

India had no choice. The cost of inaction was higher than the risk of escalation. When a state uses terrorism as statecraft, diplomacy alone cannot contain the threat. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi said after the Balakot strike, “The world is seeing a new India. One that will no longer tolerate those who bleed us by a thousand cuts.”

This strike wasn’t just about Balakot. It was a policy shift—a declaration that India’s patience has limits, and her response will now be dictated by strength, not restraint.

Conclusion

For too long, Pakistan’s deep state played a double game—fighting terror in the West’s eyes while feeding it in the East. The Indian airstrikes were a wake-up call, not just to Pakistan, but to the world. Terrorism cannot be compartmentalised. It has no religion, no geography—but it thrives on political cowardice and diplomatic ambiguity.

India chose to end the ambiguity. And history will record that as a necessary turning point.

The post India Strikes Back: A Timely Blow Against Pakistan-Backed Terrorism appeared first on South Asia Corner.

Since its inception in 1947, Pakistan has grappled with a complex interplay of power dynamics and ideological differences. The country’s two most potent regions, Punjab and Pashtun-majority Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), have maintained a tenuous alliance that has historically dictated the state’s political and military direction. This union, a marriage of convenience rather than ideological harmony, has been held together mainly by the coercive might of the military and the carefully crafted myth of a unified national identity. However, the recent wave of protests spearheaded by Imran Khan, compounded by growing sectarian and ethnic divisions, threatens to tear this fragile balance apart, potentially delivering the final blow to the state’s cohesion. Discontent, Animosity, and Sectarian Rifts in Pakistan: Is the State Approaching Its Breaking Point?

Historical Context: An Uneasy Alliance

With its economic might, bureaucratic dominance, and historical allegiance to the military establishment, Punjab has long been the linchpin of Pakistan’s power structure. In contrast, though vital for their strategic position and contributions to the military, the Pashtun regions have remained ideologically distinct and often alienated from the Punjabi-dominated centre. This disparity has given rise to long-standing grievances, particularly among Pashtun communities, who feel they have been used as pawns in the state’s geopolitical ambitions, such as during the Afghan wars and the so-called “War on Terror.”

The military, primarily dominated by Punjabi officers, has historically been the glue binding these regions. However, its policies—marked by suppression, exploitation, and an over-reliance on coercion—have only deepened the mistrust between these key regions. The current political upheaval has brought these simmering tensions to the forefront, with Imran Khan’s ouster and subsequent confrontations with the military as a catalyst for broader discontent.

Imran Khan and the Breakdown of the Status Quo

Imran Khan’s rise to power in 2018 was seen as a carefully orchestrated move by the military to maintain its grip on the country. However, his eventual fallout with the establishment marked a significant turning point. Khan, a Pashtun by ethnicity, has strategically played on his dual identity as a national figure and a representative of Pashtun aspirations. His fiery rhetoric against the military establishment and its alleged interference in political affairs has resonated deeply in KPK and other Pashtun-dominated areas, reigniting ethnic and regional loyalties.

The events of 2023-24, particularly Khan’s arrest and the violent protests that followed, have exposed the fault lines within Pakistan’s power structure. For the first time, the military faced direct and widespread public opposition in urban centres and historically militarized regions like KPK. The attacks on military installations during the May 9 protests highlighted a significant shift: the Pashtun-dominated areas were no longer willing to accept the dominance of the Punjabi-led army establishment unquestioningly.

Sectarian and Ethnic Rifts: A Widening Chasm

The mistrust between Punjab and KPK is not merely political but deeply rooted in cultural and ideological differences. Punjab’s historical alignment with a centralized, authoritarian governance model contrasts sharply with the Pashtun ethos of tribal autonomy and resistance to external control. This divergence has been exacerbated by the military’s heavy-handed approach in regions like KPK and Balochistan, where operations against insurgents and militants have often indiscriminately targeted local populations, fueling resentment.

Furthermore, sectarian divisions have added another layer of complexity. While Punjab has a significant Sunni majority, the rise of sectarian militancy in recent decades has created fractures even within this demographic. Meanwhile, the Pashtun regions, though predominantly Sunni, have historically adhered to a more tribal and less rigid interpretation of Islam, which clashes with the growing influence of hardline Sunni groups often backed by Punjabi networks.

The result is a state where ethnic, sectarian, and regional identities are increasingly asserting themselves against the narrative of a unified “Pakistani” identity. Economic woes, political instability, and a lack of coherent national leadership have accelerated this fragmentation.

The Role of the Military: Protector or Perpetrator?

The military’s dual role as both a stabilizing force and a self-serving power broker is at the heart of Pakistan’s current crisis. For decades, the military has justified its dominance by presenting itself as the guardian of Pakistan’s territorial integrity and Islamic identity. However, its repeated interventions in civilian politics and its failure to address underlying socio-economic issues have eroded its credibility.

Imran Khan’s narrative of the military as an overreaching and corrupt institution has found fertile ground among the Pashtun population, who already view the establishment with suspicion. The growing perception that the army serves Punjabi interests at the expense of other regions has further alienated Pashtuns and other marginalized groups, such as the Baloch and Sindhis.

The Economic Dimension: Fueling Discontent

Pakistan’s economic crisis has only amplified these divisions. The disproportionate allocation of resources to Punjab, coupled with the economic marginalization of regions like KPK and Balochistan, has fueled resentment. The failure of successive governments to address these disparities has created a sense of economic apartheid, where the benefits of development are perceived to be concentrated in Punjab. At the same time, other regions are left to languish.

Imran Khan’s ability to channel this discontent into a coherent political movement has further destabilized the status quo. By framing his struggle as one against an unjust and exploitative system, Khan has united a diverse coalition of supporters, ranging from urban middle-class Punjabis to rural Pashtuns, in opposition to the military and its civilian allies.

Is This the Final Nail in Pakistan’s Coffin?

The current crisis represents a perfect storm of political, ethnic, and economic challenges threatening to unravel the state. The Punjab-KPK alliance, always fragile, is now under unprecedented strain. The military, long seen as the ultimate arbiter of power, is facing a legitimacy crisis that it may be unable to overcome.

Several scenarios could emerge from this crisis:

1. Increased Militarization: The military may attempt to reassert its control through even more aggressive tactics, risking further alienation of Pashtun and other marginalized populations.
2. Civil Disintegration: The growing mistrust and hatred between Punjab and KPK could lead to open conflict, potentially pushing the state toward fragmentation.
3. Reform and Decentralization: A less likely but hopeful scenario involves genuine political and institutional reforms that address regional grievances and redistribute power more equitably.
4. External Interventions: Pakistan’s geopolitical significance means that external actors, such as China, the US, or Saudi Arabia, may intervene to stabilize the situation, though this could come at the cost of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

The Latest Rift Over Imran Khan’s Release: Punjab vs. Pashtun Divide Deepens

The recent release of Imran Khan from detention has ignited fresh tensions between Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), exposing the deep-seated mistrust and ideological differences between the two regions. Khan’s arrest earlier this year, widely seen as orchestrated by the military, triggered massive protests, particularly in KPK, where he enjoys widespread support due to his Pashtun heritage and anti-establishment rhetoric. In contrast, Punjab’s political elite and military loyalists largely toed the establishment’s line, viewing Khan’s populism as threatening stability.

The aftermath of his release has highlighted this growing divide. Pashtun communities celebrated the decision as a victory against the Punjabi-dominated military establishment, interpreting it as a pushback against years of perceived marginalization and coercion. In KPK, large crowds took to the streets, hailing Khan as a symbol of resistance. This contrasts starkly with the subdued reaction in Punjab, where the military’s narrative of maintaining “law and order” continues to resonate among its political and bureaucratic elite.

Adding fuel to the fire, many in KPK accuse Punjab of being complicit in Khan’s earlier arrest and judicial targeting. The perception that Punjab wields disproportionate influence over national institutions has further alienated Pashtuns, who view the military’s actions as yet another attempt to suppress their regional identity and political aspirations.

The rift over Khan’s release underscores the fragility of Pakistan’s ethnic and regional unity. As Pashtuns rally behind Khan and his defiance of the establishment, Punjab’s alignment with the military risks deepening the divide. This latest episode challenges the military’s dominance and raises existential questions about the sustainability of Pakistan’s federal structure as these two powerful regions drift further apart.

Conclusion: A State at Crossroads

Pakistan’s current predicament is not merely a political crisis; it is an existential challenge that calls into question the very foundations of the state. The growing mistrust between Punjab and KPK, exacerbated by Imran Khan’s populist movement, has exposed the fragility of a system built on coercion rather than consensus.

Whether Pakistan can navigate this crisis will depend on the willingness of its leaders—both civilian and military—to confront the root causes of discontent and embark on a path of genuine reform. However, if the current trajectory of repression, exclusion, and denial continues, Pakistan risks becoming a cautionary tale of a state undone by its internal contradictions. The stakes could not be higher, and the time for change is running out.

The recent release of Imran Khan from detention has ignited fresh tensions between Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), exposing the deep-seated mistrust and ideological differences between the two regions. Khan’s arrest earlier this year, widely seen as orchestrated by the military, triggered massive protests, particularly in KPK, where he enjoys widespread support due to his Pashtun heritage and anti-establishment rhetoric. In contrast, Punjab’s political elite and military loyalists largely toed the establishment’s line, viewing Khan’s populism as threatening stability.

The aftermath of his release has highlighted this growing divide. Pashtun communities celebrated the decision as a victory against the Punjabi-dominated military establishment, interpreting it as a pushback against years of perceived marginalization and coercion. In KPK, large crowds took to the streets, hailing Khan as a symbol of resistance. This contrasts starkly with the subdued reaction in Punjab, where the military’s narrative of maintaining “law and order” continues to resonate among its political and bureaucratic elite.

Adding fuel to the fire, many in KPK accuse Punjab of being complicit in Khan’s earlier arrest and judicial targeting. The perception that Punjab wields disproportionate influence over national institutions has further alienated Pashtuns, who view the military’s actions as yet another attempt to suppress their regional identity and political aspirations.

The rift over Khan’s release underscores the fragility of Pakistan’s ethnic and regional unity. As Pashtuns rally behind Khan and his defiance of the establishment, Punjab’s alignment with the military risks deepening the divide. This latest episode challenges the military’s dominance and raises existential questions about the sustainability of Pakistan’s federal structure as these two powerful regions drift further apart.

The deepening segregationist proportions between Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) are casting a long shadow over Pakistan’s unity, drawing eerie parallels to the events that led to the separation of East Pakistan in 1971. The growing mistrust, fueled by ethnic, regional, and ideological disparities, mirrors the historical resentment felt by Bengalis under a similarly Punjabi-dominated state. Just as East Pakistan’s grievances against economic exploitation, political marginalization, and cultural suppression culminated in its secession to form Bangladesh, there is a growing fear that a similar fate could await Pakistan if these divisions remain unaddressed.

The systematic sidelining of Pashtun voices within the military and government, coupled with the crackdown on dissent in KPK, risks alienating the region further. If Pashtuns, emboldened by Imran Khan’s anti-establishment rhetoric, continue to feel excluded from the national framework, the possibility of a separatist sentiment cannot be dismissed. The fragile “Hillali Pakistan” (crescent-emblemed Pakistan) could fracture into a “Jalil Pakistan” (a dishonoured or fragmented state) if the Punjabi elite fails to address these underlying tensions.

To avoid repeating history, Pakistan must confront its internal inequalities and adopt a federal structure that genuinely respects the autonomy and aspirations of all its regions. Without meaningful reform, the state risks descending into a cycle of fragmentation that could irrevocably alter its borders and identity, mirroring the very downfall it seeks to forget.

The post Discontent, Animosity, and Sectarian Rifts in Pakistan: Is the State Approaching Its Breaking Point? appeared first on South Asia Corner.

Introduction

Pakistan is currently grappling with a mammoth economic crisis, plagued by militancy, religious segregation, negative GDP growth, and a tainted reputation stemming from its past involvement in terrorism. The question that arises is whether the economic woes the country faces today are a direct consequence of the atrocities committed during the 1971 genocide in Bangladesh. Let’s delve deeper into the factors contributing to Pakistan’s economic misery and their potential link to the events of 1971.

Economic Crisis and Historical Trauma

• The ongoing economic crisis in Pakistan is multifaceted, with roots that can be traced back to the genocide of 1971.
• The genocide in Bangladesh, marked by extra-judicial killings, arson, rapes, and the annihilation of unarmed Bengalis, had a lasting impact on the region’s economic stability.
• The exploitation of Bangladesh‘s resources, fuelled by racism and superiority complexes, created a power dynamic that continues to haunt Pakistan economically.

Leadership Crisis and Military Dominance

• Pakistan’s leadership crisis and military rule and interference have hindered the country’s progress and perpetuated economic disparity.
• The ruling elite and military hierarchy in Pakistan have been accused of siphoning off wealth to foreign banks while the general populace suffers from extreme poverty and lack of basic amenities.
• The military’s stronghold on the country’s governance exacerbates the economic woes and undermines civilian authority.

Global Perception and Terrorism Stigma

• Pakistan’s association with terrorism, exemplified by harbouring individuals like Osama bin Laden, has tarnished its global image and led to isolation and scrutiny.
• The world looks at Pakistan with suspicion and distrust, attributing the country’s economic struggles to its history of supporting extremist elements.
• Overcoming the stigma of terrorism will be crucial for Pakistan to regain international trust and restore economic stability.

Conclusion

The economic misery plaguing Pakistan today has deep-rooted connections to the events of the 1971 genocide in Bangladesh. The exploitation, discrimination, and violence unleashed during that period continue to reverberate through Pakistan’s socio-political landscape, contributing to its current state of distress. Addressing the leadership crisis, ending military dominance, and distancing itself from past associations with terrorism are imperative steps for Pakistan to break free from this cycle of economic turmoil and rebuild its reputation on the global stage. It’s time for Pakistan to confront its past and forge a path towards a more prosperous and inclusive future.

The post Pakistan: Are They Paying for the 1971 Genocide with This Economic Misery? appeared first on South Asia Corner.

The Genesis of Struggle:
The road to independence was paved with the blood of those who dared to dream of a free and sovereign Bangladesh. The heinous acts committed by the Pakistani army during the Liberation War of 1971 are a dark chapter in human history, reminiscent of the Holocaust. An estimated three million lives were lost, and the atrocities included the violation of 800,000 women, leaving an enduring scar on the nation’s psyche. The struggle for independence was not merely a fight for territorial sovereignty but a battle for preserving dignity, human rights, and the right to self-determination.

Nine Months of Agony:
The nine months of freedom fighting were marked by unimaginable hardships, with the Bengali population facing systematic genocide. Villages were razed, families were torn apart, and countless lives were lost. The resilience of the Bengali people shone through as they resisted occupation, cruelty, and injustice. Amidst the chaos, India emerged as a beacon of support, providing crucial assistance that played a pivotal role in the eventual victory.
The Role of India:
India’s support for Bangladesh’s independence was a defining moment in the subcontinent’s history. The Indian Armed Forces, under the leadership of General Sam Manekshaw, played a crucial role in the liberation of Bangladesh. The intervention of the Indian military proved instrumental in tipping the scales in favour of the Bengali freedom fighters, leading to the eventual defeat of the Pakistani forces. The friendship forged between India and Bangladesh during those tumultuous times remains integral to the two nations’ shared history.

Celebrating Half a Century of Freedom:
As Bangladesh commemorates 52 years of independence, the achievements and progress made by the nation are commendable. Bangladesh has emerged as a resilient and dynamic nation, from rebuilding war-torn infrastructure to fostering economic growth. The vibrant culture, rich heritage, and warmth of its people are a testament to the strength that arises from adversity.

The Unrecognised Genocide:
Despite the enormity of the atrocities committed during the Liberation War, the international community’s recognition of the genocide remains limited. The world, at large, seems to have turned a blind eye to the pain and suffering endured by the Bengali people. The lack of acknowledgement on a global scale is a profound injustice akin to the silence surrounding the Holocaust. The scars of 1971 continue to haunt the minds of 20 million Bengalis, demanding recognition and justice for the victims.

The Lingering Heart Murmur:
The unresolved issue of recognition perpetuates a lingering heart murmur in the minds of Bangladeshis worldwide. The pain and trauma of the past persist, and the call for acknowledgement reverberates through the generations. The international community must recognise the atrocities committed during the Liberation War, not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also to honour the memory of those who sacrificed their lives for the cause of freedom.

Conclusion:

Bangladesh’s 52nd Victory Day is a poignant reflection, remembrance, and celebration moment. The nation has come a long way since its birth, overcoming immense challenges to establish itself as a thriving democracy. However, the scars of 1971 linger, and the world’s failure to recognise the genocide remains a stain on the pages of history. As Bangladesh moves forward, the sacrifices of the past must be acknowledged, ensuring that the voices of the victims are heard and that justice prevails. The story of Bangladesh’s victory is not only a testament to the resilience of its people but also a plea for a world that values truth, justice, and the dignity of every human life.

The post “Bangladesh at 52: Commemorating Victory Amidst the Shadows of 1971” appeared first on South Asia Corner.

The world of espionage, intrigue, and covert operations has always been shrouded in secrecy, making it challenging to discern fact from fiction. In recent years, there have been rumours and speculations about Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), allegedly orchestrating a covert campaign to oust Prime Minister Imran Khan. This essay delves into the complex web of events and alliances that supposedly unfolded since 2019 when Saudi Prince Salman’s leak to Nepal News suggested ISI’s involvement in colluding with anti-Saudi and anti-Salman social media groups, all while maintaining a facade of support for the Prime Minister.

The Alleged Leak and its Implications:

In 2019, an unprecedented leak to Nepal News purportedly exposed the ISI’s involvement in clandestine activities targeting Saudi Prince Salman, the heir apparent to the Saudi throne. The leak hinted at collusion between ISI and various anti-Saudi and anti-Salman social media groups campaigning against the Saudi royal family and their alleged involvement in the Jamal Khashoggi murder. This revelation raised eyebrows globally, as it appeared to be a stark departure from Pakistan’s traditionally strong ties with Saudi Arabia.

Imran Khan’s Complex Role:

At the heart of this alleged covert campaign lies the duplicitous role of Prime Minister Imran Khan. Reports suggest that Imran Khan maintained a close relationship with Prince Salman during this period, even chauffeuring him like an Uber driver to secure much-needed financial assistance for Pakistan. However, the ISI allegedly played a more intricate game beneath the surface. Imran Khan was playing with fire naively – little did he know Frankenstein’s reach and its morbid past records of sending heads of state to the fellows. The sweet-talking playboy thought he will charm the band of gigantic generals as he did with the socialities in the West.

Covert vs Overt Actions:

It is essential to distinguish between covert and overt operations to understand the clandestine actions attributed to the ISI. Covert operations are typically executed behind the scenes, often concealed from public knowledge, and involve intelligence agencies pursuing strategic objectives. On the other hand, overt actions are those that occur publicly, often aligning with a nation’s official stance. 

The alleged covert campaign orchestrated by the ISI purportedly involved:

1. Social Media Manipulation: Reports suggest that ISI actively collaborated with anti-Saudi and anti-Salman social media groups, using them as tools to tarnish the Saudi royal family’s image. These actions aimed to create a rift between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, potentially jeopardizing Imran Khan’s relationship with Prince Salman.
2. Funding Anti-Saudi Activists: Allegations have surfaced that the ISI provided financial support to individuals and groups engaged in anti-Saudi activism, further fueling the campaign against the Saudi royal family.
3. Undermining Imran Khan: The primary objective of this alleged covert campaign was to discredit Prime Minister Imran Khan, possibly to unseat him from power. By creating the image of a leader deceiving his allies and his people, the ISI may have sought to weaken his position.

The ISI’s Covert Activities Across South Asia and the Middle East

The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) is Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency, founded in 1948. Since its inception, the ISI has been involved in various secret and covert activities across South Asia and the Middle East. This brief examines the ISI’s activities in India, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and the Middle East, focusing on critical events and conflicts.

India:

The ISI’s covert activities in India have been a longstanding source of tension between the two nations. During the 1965 and 1971 India-Pakistan Wars, the ISI played a role in espionage, sabotage, and supporting militant groups in Kashmir.

1999 during the Kargil War, the ISI was accused of supporting infiltrating militants in the Kargil region. This conflict escalated into a full-scale war between India and Pakistan.

The 2008 Mumbai hotel attack, carried out by Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), brought attention to the ISI’s involvement in training and supporting terrorist organizations operating against India.

Bangladesh:

During the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971, the ISI reportedly masterminded & provided support to Pakistani forces against the Bangladesh independence movement, orchestrating an inhuman Hindu Genocide. This covert involvement strained Pakistan’s relations with Bangladesh, leading to independence.

Afghanistan:

In Afghanistan, the ISI has a complex history. It supported Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet-Afghan War, contributing to the eventual Soviet withdrawal.

However, post-9/11, the ISI’s alleged support for the Afghan Taliban and other militant groups has strained relations with the U.S. and Afghanistan. Accusations of ISI’s harbouring of terror groups continue to be a contentious issue.

Sri Lanka:

During Sri Lanka’s civil conflict, the ISI reportedly supported the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). This covert assistance ended with the LTTE’s defeat in 2009.

Middle East:

The ISI has maintained strategic relationships with countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran in the Middle East while involved in various covert activities, including intelligence-sharing and political influence operations.

The ISI’s covert activities have significantly impacted the political and security landscape of South Asia and the Middle East. While some allegations remain unproven, the agency’s role in supporting militant groups and engaging in espionage has perpetuated regional tensions and strained international relations. Efforts towards transparency and diplomacy are essential to address these concerns and foster regional stability. The fatalities incurred due to its mindless thuggery have cost many innocent lives across the region and etched an indelible mark in millions of people’s minds. 

Possible Motivations and Alliances:

One must examine the shifting dynamics of Pakistan’s foreign policy and alliances in recent years to understand the motivations behind this complex web of actions. Pakistan has historically maintained close ties with Saudi Arabia, receiving significant financial aid and support. However, as global dynamics evolve, Pakistan has increasingly sought to diversify its partnerships.

One theory suggests that the ISI’s actions were driven by a desire to pivot away from Saudi Arabia and towards emerging power centres, such as China and Russia, as part of Pakistan’s efforts to secure economic and military support. This pivot may have necessitated a distancing from Saudi Arabia, leading to the alleged covert campaign against Prince Salman.

Moreover, Pakistan’s involvement in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and its deepening ties with China could have influenced the ISI’s actions. China’s strategic interests often diverge from Saudi Arabia’s, potentially prompting Pakistan to recalibrate its foreign policy to align more closely with Beijing.

Conclusion:

The alleged covert campaign by Pakistan’s ISI to oust Prime Minister Imran Khan, with the backdrop of its rumoured collaboration with anti-Saudi and anti-Salman social media groups, is a complex and murky narrative. While such allegations have garnered attention, concrete evidence remains elusive, and the true extent of ISI’s involvement remains a matter of speculation.

It is essential to approach these claims cautiously, as intelligence and covert operations are inherently secretive, and misinformation can quickly muddy the waters. Further investigation and transparency are required to unravel this intricate web of intrigue. Pakistan’s global role and alliances will undoubtedly shape its future political landscape as international relations continue to evolve.

Bibliography:

1. Haqqani, Husain. “Pakistan’s ISI: Networked, Funded, and Armed.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2009.
2. Khan, Ijaz. “The ISI and the Pakistani Media: A Partnership of Interests.” International Journal of Communication, 2016.
3. Rizvi, Hasan Askari. “The Military and Politics in Pakistan, 1947-1997.” Oxford University Press, 2000.

The post Pakistan Army has been Planning to Oust Imran Khan since 2019: Secret Services (ISI): Covert Campaigns, Political Intrigues, and Unravelling Alliances. appeared first on South Asia Corner.

Introduction:

Pakistan’s upcoming election is poised to be a critical juncture in the nation’s political landscape. As the country prepares for the polls under a caretaker government, it is important to reflect on the history of botched elections, concerns of cronyism, alleged interference by the deep state apparatus, and the military’s influence on political power. These factors have raised questions about the credibility and trustworthiness of Pakistan’s electoral process. This blog aims to analyze these issues and evaluate the prospects of a free and fair election, while considering Pakistan’s aspirations for a stable democratic future.

Pakistan is gearing up for its next general election, which is scheduled to be held in August 2023. The election will be held under a caretaker government, which is a temporary government that is appointed to oversee the transition to a new elected government.

There is a lot of skepticism about whether the upcoming election will be free and fair. Pakistan has a long history of botched elections, and there are concerns that the military will try to influence the outcome of the vote. The military has a history of interfering in Pakistani politics, and it is seen by many as the most powerful institution in the country.

A History of Botched Elections:

Pakistan has had a tumultuous history with elections marred by allegations of rigging, manipulation, and irregularities. Such incidents have undermined the people’s confidence in the electoral system and raised doubts about the transparency and fairness of the process. Past elections have often been tarnished by controversies, creating a challenging environment for genuine democracy to flourish.

Cronyism and Deep State Apparatus:

The influence of cronyism and the alleged interference of the deep state apparatus in Pakistan’s political affairs have been persistent concerns. The presence of powerful interest groups and their influence on electoral outcomes can erode the principles of fairness and equal representation. These factors have contributed to a system where certain political actors enjoy undue advantages, thus distorting the democratic process.

The Military’s Relentless Pursuit of Power:

Pakistan’s military has historically wielded considerable influence over the country’s political landscape. Frequent military coups and the direct or indirect control exercised by the military establishment have affected the democratic trajectory of the nation. The military’s role in politics raises questions about the fairness of the electoral process, as well as the extent of civilian control over the government.

Secret Liaison with Banned Internationally Ill-Reputed Terror Cells:

Accusations of secret liaisons between elements within Pakistan’s power structure and internationally ill-reputed terror cells have fueled concerns about the integrity of the country’s electoral process. Such associations, if proven, would not only raise questions about the authenticity of the government but also impact regional stability and international relations.

Perpetuating Cross-Border Terrorism:

Pakistan’s alleged involvement in cross-border terrorism in neighboring countries has further strained its credibility on the global stage. The perception that the military establishment harbors and supports militant groups compromises the trust placed in the country’s leadership and institutions. This reputation undermines the credibility of any claims to hold free and fair elections.

Restoring Trust and Ensuring a Free and Fair Election:

Given the historical challenges and concerns surrounding Pakistan’s electoral process, restoring trust is imperative for a successful election. The caretaker government must take proactive measures to ensure transparency, impartiality, and equal opportunities for all candidates and political parties. International observers and monitoring bodies should be invited to oversee the process, providing independent validation and increasing public confidence.

Reforms and institutional strengthening are also vital in bolstering the democratic foundations of Pakistan. This includes strengthening the independence of the election commission, improving voter registration systems, and promoting greater political accountability. Additionally, the military must demonstrate a commitment to supporting the democratic process and refrain from interfering in political affairs.

Conclusion:

Pakistan’s forthcoming election under a caretaker government presents both challenges and hopes for a more stable and democratic future. Despite the history of botched elections, allegations of cronyism, and concerns regarding the deep state apparatus, it is crucial to acknowledge the aspirations of the Pakistani people for a free and fair electoral process. By addressing these challenges head-on, Pakistan can regain international trust and lay the foundation for a government that represents the will of its people and promotes peace and stability in the region. The world will indeed be watching closely to see if Pakistan can rise above its past and embrace a new era of transparent governance and genuine democratic practices.

Pakistan is facing a severe debt crisis. The country’s external debt has reached $126 billion, and its debt-to-GDP ratio is over 70%. This is the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in Pakistan’s history. The country is also facing a balance of payments crisis, and its foreign exchange reserves are dwindling.

The government has been forced to take a number of austerity measures in order to reduce the deficit and repay its debts. These measures have included raising taxes, cutting subsidies, and devaluing the currency. However, these measures have not been enough to stop the country’s slide into debt.

The latest IMF loan repayment and servicing is only going to make the situation worse. The country will have to repay $3.6 billion to the IMF in June 2023. This will be a major strain on the country’s finances.

If Pakistan does not take urgent action to address its debt crisis, it could default on its loans. This would have a devastating impact on the country’s economy and could lead to political instability.

The debt crisis is a major challenge for Pakistan. The government will need to take urgent action to address the crisis. This will require a combination of economic reforms, political stability, and international assistance.

The post Pakistan’s Forthcoming Election Under a Caretaker Government: Can the World Trust a Free and Fair Vote? appeared first on South Asia Corner.

Pakistan’s economy has been in trouble for several years now. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio has steadily risen and currently stands at around 87%. The country’s budget deficit has also been increasing and currently stands at about 8% of GDP. These numbers indicate that Pakistan’s economy is not in good shape, and there is a real debt crisis risk.

The political situation in Pakistan is also fragile. The country has been ruled by a military establishment for much of its history, and there have been several instances of political instability in recent years. The current government, led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has been accused of being weak and ineffective. This has led to concerns about the government’s ability to manage the country’s economic crisis.

Corruption is another major issue in Pakistan. The country is known for its rampant political and military corruption, which has harmed the economy. Corruption has led to a lack of investment, reduced economic growth, and a general lack of trust in the government.

The recent fall of Afghanistan has raised concerns about Pakistan’s stability. Afghanistan shares a long and porous border with Pakistan, and the Taliban’s takeover of the country has led to fears of increased violence and instability in Pakistan. There is also a risk of an influx of refugees from Afghanistan, which could further strain Pakistan’s already weak economy.

The world has reason to be worried about Pakistan’s stability. As a nuclear-armed country, any instability in Pakistan could have serious global consequences. There is also the risk that Pakistan could tip over the edge and become a failed state, with all the attendant problems.

Furthermore, the economic crisis in Pakistan has led to a great deal of human suffering. Millions live in poverty, and the country’s social services are underfunded and overstretched. The international monetary and funding agencies are still determining if Pakistan will be able to service a loan given to it, which makes it difficult for the country to get the financial assistance it needs.

The United Nations’ decision to pull out of Afghanistan after two decades of presence in the country is expected to impact the region significantly. While the withdrawal aims to end the conflict and bring stability to Afghanistan, many experts fear that it could lead to a rise in insurgency and violence within Afghanistan and in neighbouring countries, particularly Pakistan.

Pakistan has been struggling with its insurgency problem for years, with its northwest regions being a hotbed of terrorist activity. The Taliban, which has close ties to Pakistan, has been able to operate freely in the region, launching attacks not only in Afghanistan but also in Pakistan. The UN’s pullout from Afghanistan will likely encourage the Taliban and other extremist groups, who may see it as a victory and use it as a recruiting tool.
One of the biggest concerns is that the Taliban could increase its cross-border attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan. This could increase violence and instability in the region, potentially destabilising the Pakistani government. The Taliban has already been accused of carrying out attacks in Pakistan, including the recent bombing of a hotel in Quetta that killed several people.

In addition to the threat of increased insurgency, the UN’s pullout from Afghanistan could also harm the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan. Pakistan has over 1.4 million registered Afghan refugees and many more unregistered. The UN’s presence in Afghanistan has helped to provide support and assistance to these refugees, and the withdrawal could leave them vulnerable.

There are also concerns about the impact the UN’s pullout could have on the peace process in Afghanistan. The Taliban has been engaged in peace talks with the Afghan government, and the UN has played a pivotal role in facilitating these talks. With the UN’s presence, it may be easier to bring the Taliban and the Afghan government to the negotiating table.

The UN’s pullout from Afghanistan is likely to have far-reaching consequences, not only for Afghanistan but also for the wider region. The rise of insurgency and violence in Pakistan could destabilise the country and the area as a whole. The international community must work together to ensure that the withdrawal is carried out to minimise the risk of violence and instability in the region. This will require a coordinated effort to address the root causes of the conflict, including poverty, corruption, and political instability, and to provide support and assistance to those affected by the conflict.

In conclusion, Pakistan faces a severe economic crisis compounded by a fragile political establishment, rampant corruption, and massive sovereign debt. The recent fall of Afghanistan has raised concerns about Pakistan’s stability, and there is a risk that the country could tip over the edge and become a failed state. The world has reason to be worried about Pakistan’s stability, particularly given its nuclear arsenal. The international community must take steps to help Pakistan overcome its economic crisis and build a more stable and prosperous future for its people.

The post Is It On The Brink ? appeared first on South Asia Corner.

India’s security has been concerned due to constant instigation and incursions by neighbouring rogue states. The most significant threats to Indian security come from the Himalayan region and across the border from Kashmir and Punjab. The foreign powers behind these incursions aim to destabilize the world’s largest democracy and the federal statehood of India.

The primary source of Indian security concerns is Pakistan, which has been involved in cross-border terrorism for decades. Pakistan’s intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), provides support to terrorist groups operating in India, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), among others. These groups have carried out numerous attacks in India, including the 2001 Parliament attack and the 2008 Mumbai attacks. These attacks have caused immense damage to India’s security and have resulted in significant loss of life.

Sources of Eminating Threats : Another significant source of security threats for India is China, which has been in a territorial dispute with India for several decades. The two countries have had several military standoffs along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in recent years, including the 2020 Galwan Valley clash, which resulted in the deaths of several Indian soldiers. China has also been involved in infrastructure development in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), which India considers its sovereign territory. China’s support for Pakistan and its increasing influence in the region significantly threaten India’s security.

Security Issues 

Apart from Pakistan and China, India also faces security threats from neighbouring countries. Nepal, for instance, has been involved in a territorial dispute with India over the Kalapani area. Sri Lanka’s relationship with India has been strained due to its ties with China, which has invested heavily in infrastructure development in Sri Lanka.
To counter these security threats, India has adopted a multi-pronged approach. The country has invested heavily in modernizing its armed forces and enhancing its intelligence capabilities. It has also strengthened its border infrastructure and established a dedicated organization, the Border Security Force (BSF), to manage its borders. India has also engaged in diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan from the international community and has worked to improve its relationship with neighbouring countries.

The Pressure : India’s security is under constant pressure from neighbouring rogue states, foreign powers, and other sources. The country faces significant challenges, such as cross-border terrorism, territorial disputes, and increasing Chinese influence in the region. However, India has adopted a multi-faceted approach to address these challenges and is working towards enhancing its security capabilities.

Foreign Policy 

Although India’s foreign policy is aimed at promoting peace, stability, and economic growth in the region and beyond, India has sought to establish itself as a reliable strategic partner to other major countries and international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU). India has played an active role in promoting global security and has been actively involved in peacekeeping missions worldwide. India’s foreign policy is based on the principles of non-alignment, peaceful coexistence, and the promotion of regional and global cooperation.

World Stage 

India’s standing as a reliable strategic partner on the world stage has grown significantly in recent years. India has established strategic partnerships with several major powers, including the United States, Japan, and Australia. The strategic alliance with the US has grown stronger in recent years, with the two countries working together on defence, security, and economic cooperation issues. India has also established strong partnerships with Japan, Australia, and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to promote regional security and economic growth.
India’s engagement with the UN has been significant, with India being one of the organization’s founding members. India has actively participated in the UN’s peacekeeping missions and has contributed significantly to the organization’s efforts to promote global peace and security. India has also played a leading role in the UN’s efforts to address global challenges such as climate change, sustainable development, and poverty eradication.

Partnership 

India has also worked to establish itself as a reliable partner to the EU. The EU is India’s largest trading partner, and India has sought to deepen its economic and strategic partnership with the bloc. India has also worked closely with the EU on climate change, security, and counter-terrorism issues.

Summary 

In conclusion, India’s foreign policy promotes peace, stability, and economic growth in the region and beyond. India has established itself as a reliable strategic partner to other major countries and international organizations such as the UN and the EU. India’s engagement with the world has been significant, with India actively promoting global peace and security. India’s strategic partnerships with other major powers have grown stronger in recent years, highlighting India’s increasing importance on the world stage.

The post Constant Chaos Fomented by the Deep States’ Rogue Elements appeared first on South Asia Corner.

Introduction

Wage delays and nonpayment are still a problem in Pakistani territory that has been captured illegally. Anti-government sit-ins have become a common occurrence. The personnel of one or more ministries are occasionally the victims—one day, it’s the teachers, and the next, it’s the physicians. Documents and history books indicate that these territories’ citizens achieved independence in 1947. But the reality is that they were reduced to second-class socioeconomic citizens. With a population of 1.5 million, the area lacks the infrastructure, financial allocations, employment possibilities, industries, and other amenities that the rest of Pakistan takes for granted.

Now that the nation has experienced recent floods that have impacted more than 33 million people, it is impossible to predict what will happen to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Tens of thousands of animals have died, and 2 million acres of crops have been devastated. Uzair Younus of the Atlantic Council and economist Ammar Khan estimated the approximate cost of direct damage to roads, homes, animals, and crops at around $3 billion, a staggering sum for a developing nation like Pakistan.

Issues in Hand

Pakistan has significant climatic issues. n spite of being one of the countries with the lowest carbon emissions worldwide, Pakistan was listed as one of the most vulnerable to climate change and extreme weather events in the Global Climate Risk Index for 2021. The nation first suffered a record temperature in spring, and they were inundated just a few months later. The city of Jacobabad, where temperatures spiked to 50 Celsius/122 Fahrenheit, is currently underwater.
Many people in Pakistan and abroad have used this catastrophe as the best illustration of climate justice, arguing that the Paris Agreement, which was signed in 2015 and currently has 175 signatories, including the European Union, should require the Global North to compensate the Global South for losses and damage.

Situation

As winter draws near, millions of Pakistanis remain without a place to call home. Jill McGivering of the BBC has just returned from one of the worst-affected areas. According to McGivering, many victims claim that unscrupulous government officials deny them access to services like shelter, money, and blankets. However, McGivering is informed by Pakistan’s interior minister Rehman Malik that “this is dishonesty on the side of the people.”

Corruption

According to local media, Pakistani government employees are suspected of using bribes to distribute flood relief supplies in Pakistani-occupied Kashmir. According to reports from the authorities, Sabir Hussain, the chief minister of Gilgit-coordinator, Baltistan’s, charged the deputy commissioner of Hunza (DC) with stealing two truckloads of aid supplies delivered by the Chinese embassy in Xinjiang. regional media

Sabir said that Hunza DC crossed the Sost Pakistan-China border and then kidnapped vehicles carrying aid supplies delivered by China’s Xinjiang foreign office. He said Hunza DC conspired with DC customs at the edge to take the relief vehicles away. The aid was supplied by China’s Xinjiang foreign office at the acting governor of Gilgit-request. Baltistan’s
Local media claimed interim governor Syed Amjad Ali Zaidi was handling the disastrous continuing flooding scenario.

Sabir provided cargo receipts and documentation from China’s Foreign Affairs Office as proof of the alleged bribes. According to the document attached, two aid trucks have been supplied by China to Gilgit Baltistan. But after entering the UK from the southern Chinese border, they appear to have vanished. Sabir Hussain asserted that Hunza DC had to have known about it for it to have happened.

Hunza DC had already faced accusations of corruption. During the building of the Hassanabad Bridge in Hunza, he was charged with a

Crime. Millions allegedly went down the drain in commissions and kickbacks during the building process.
Local media claimed interim governor Syed Amjad Ali Zaidi was handling the disastrous continuing flooding scenario.
On Wednesday, citizens of Gilgit Baltistan

protested against state-sponsored discrimination and corruption in Pakistani-occupied Kashmir. They regretted the Pakistani government’s intentional deprivation of their rights and compensation. They are left with no alternative but to take to the streets because of the corrupt system.

The natives are not treated equally with citizens or employees from other regions of mainland Pakistan by Islamabad stooges, who have been predominantly employed in government departments to police and marginalise them. The ruling class is corrupt, and they never show even the tiniest sign of wanting to change the situation.

Problems; knee Jerk Reaction

Wage delays and nonpayment are still a problem in Pakistani territory that has been captured illegally. Anti-government sit-ins have become a common occurrence. The personnel of one or more ministries are occasionally the victims—one day, it’s the teachers, and the next, it’s the physicians. Documents and history books indicate that these territories’ citizens achieved independence in 1947. But the reality is that they were reduced to second-class socioeconomic citizens. With a population of 1.5 million, the area lacks the infrastructure, financial allocations, employment possibilities, industries, and other amenities that the rest of Pakistan takes for granted.

Future
Now that the nation has experienced recent floods that have impacted more than 33 million people, it is impossible to predict what will happen to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Conclusion

A country which has repeatedly failed from its inception to uphold the dignity of its stature and is mired with unscrupulous backhand dealing, cronyism, misappropriation of relief, funds, and food for the worst suffers of the catastrophic flood speaks volumes of its longevity and viability to remain as a nation-state or will it disintegrate like a house of cards one fine morning?

The post Pakistan Enmeshed in Flood Relief Corruption appeared first on South Asia Corner.

A deep state’s objectives may include maintaining the state’s existence, job security, increased power and influence, and pursuing ideological or practical goals. Blocking, rejecting, and undermining their rules, regulations, and instructions can work against the objectives of elected authorities.

Since Pakistan’s inception as an independent nation-state, the deep state has existed. The deep state in Pakistan found a favourable climate that closely supported its creation and expansion due to several variables that predominated throughout Pakistan’s early years. The deep state in Pakistan, also known as the “Establishment,” must be addressed in an organized way based on honesty, sincerity, and a sense of true purpose if Pakistan is to progress into a responsible nation-state in the world of the “rules-based international order.”

Pakistan is a junction of South Asia, West Asia, and Central Asia and is away from resource-efficient to resource-deficient countries. Being the gateway to Central Asia and a suitable route of access for world powers into land-locked Afghanistan, Pakistan is the second country founded based on religion – the first being Israel, which was founded in the name of Judaism. For Pakistan, it was Islam.
As a middle power, Pakistan has the sixth-largest armed forces worldwide and is also a declared nuclear-weapon state, the second in South Asia and the only nation in the Muslim world to have that status. Pakistan is affected by internal instability and deep-rooted radicalization of society, reflected by the high levels of sectarian and terrorist violence. Their complicity in supporting the Taliban and Haqqani Network in Afghanistan has resulted in the spread of Islamist radicalization and terrorism not just in South Asia but much beyond.

Pakistan has witnessed nothing but turmoil in its political climate since its independence. The Pakistan army has constantly meddled in its national politics, wherein Frankensteins have been created to deliver justice with political biases. The same is highlighted by the fact that Pakistan’s political environment has only known upheaval since gaining independence. The Pakistani army has been meddling in its political system ever since Frankensteins were made to administer justice with political bias. The same point is made by the fact that Pakistan has a history of successful military takeovers, including those in 1953, 1958, 1977, and 1999, which are referred to as “constitutional coups” because at the time, Ghulam Mohammad, the governor-general, dismissed the government of Khawaja Nazimuddin, the then-prime minister, despite Nazimuddin having the support of the nation’s Constituent Assembly. This established a precedent that allowed the “Doctrine of Necessity” to be used to justify greater overt military involvement against legitimately elected governments. Policymakers have been held captive by the Pakistani army’s favours, as attested by the general chosen in advance.

Currently, the Pakistani army is in charge of the nuclear arsenal and the government. Any attempt by a civil administration in Pakistan to breach a line established by the deep state on any matter is derided as “rebellion.” The deep state of Pakistan, the army, maintains its power under the guise of national security and patriotism. The usual deep state would never permit a civilian administration to assert or deepen its position, even having direct authority.

It is consequently indisputable that Pakistan’s weak and unstable administrations, which it has always had since becoming a nation-state, have fit the deep state’s continuous control over its affairs. The precarious situation of political parties and their incapacity to provide effective leadership also backed the same. Additionally, the political parties were heavily complicit in acts of corruption, nepotism, and abuse of power, which undermined the country’s democracy.

The emergence of China, a significant power, as a neighbour of Pakistan is another major variable that has supported and continues to strengthen the deep state in that country. Beijing used the chance to further its long-term geopolitical goals, such as keeping India allied with it while it salami-sliced India’s holdings in the Himalayas, by prolonging Pakistan’s weakness and subservience.

The Pakistani army, which controls Inter-Services Intelligence, is now the most potent “deep state” in the world, and its decisions are final and binding.

Independence of East Pakistan in the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War to the Indian military and India helped Mukti Bahini rebels, Pakistan is fixated on regaining control of the former state of J&K. However, Pakistan’s deep state is agitated since all of its previous initiatives have failed horribly.

The post Understanding Pakistan & Her Deep State appeared first on South Asia Corner.